About
I subscribe to hundreds of feeds, and read about a thousand items every day. I clip and share the most interesting ones here. Allow me to be your filter - I read so you don't have to.
All items are copyright and belong to their original creators. I'm just sharing them here because I find them interesting.
If you want to get all of this automatically, add the feed to your favorite aggregator.
All items are copyright and belong to their original creators. I'm just sharing them here because I find them interesting.
If you want to get all of this automatically, add the feed to your favorite aggregator.
Accounts
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.
April 12 2008
Countering the FUD about the "Orphan Works" copyright bill (that doesn't exist)
Meredith sez,
There's a bunch of FUD going around the internets today about orphaned works, thanks to this article by Mark Simon of Animation World Network. He's urging artists to write their Congresscritters about eeeeevil orphaned works legislation and screaming about how it will effectively invalidate copyright for everyone except big evil registrars.This is a really well-written piece. I've gotten a ton of email about Simon's bizarre rant, and it's nice to have a single, central place to point people to. Link (Thanks, Meredith!)The problem? There is no such legislation before Congress (there was a bill in 2006, but it was never voted on; Marybeth Peters of the Copyright Office recently spoke before a subcommittee, but that's not a bill), and Simon is flat-out wrong about every concern he raises.
I've distilled his article down to six key misconceptions, and explained why each is wrong.
